PTI Labor Research
 
 
  Power Through Information  
 
 


Latest News - November 2010

November 17, 2010
Labor Board Edges to Pro-Union Stance
Source: Newsobserver.com
By: Paul H. Derrick

RALEIGH The National Labor Relations Board has long been accused by some critics of being a pawn for unions, while others take it to task for not doing enough to protect organized labor. Whatever one's perspective, several seemingly pro-union actions by the agency in recent weeks may signal a shift in the course of federal labor relations policy.

The NLRB is charged with, among other things, safeguarding employees' right to determine whether to have unions as their bargaining representative.

Recently the board filed a legal action against an ambulance service that terminated a union-represented employee who posted negative remarks about her supervisor on Facebook. The NLRB's investigation found that the employee's Facebook postings constituted what it termed protected concerted activity, and that the company's blogging and Internet posting policy unlawfully prohibited employees from making negative remarks about the business or its supervisors.

In the board's view, such restrictions might interfere with the right of employees to engage in pro-union activity. A hearing before an administrative law judge is scheduled for early 2011.

Other recent developments suggest that the NLRB's pro-labor stance in the Facebook case may not be an isolated matter.

For example, students working on graduate degrees traditionally have received academic credit and modest income for teaching undergraduate courses. And for decades, unions have insisted that these graduate students are actually employees who have a right to unionize. The issue has been a thorny one for the NLRB and is rooted as much in the basic economics of union survival as anything else.

If, as the unions claim, graduate teaching assistants are employees, they are entitled to choose union representation and to demand collective bargaining over the terms and conditions of their teaching duties. That, in turn, could be a rich source of new members who will pay monthly dues and assessments for the ailing union movement.

The board's most thoroughly reasoned decision on the issue came in 2004, when it decided by a 3-2 vote that graduate teaching assistants were not employees. The NLRB's current chairman, formerly an attorney for the Teamsters union, was one of the two members who believed the students should have the same right to unionize as traditional employees. It appears that her belief may soon carry the day.

Graduate students at a major university in the Northeast recently attempted to organize under the auspices of the United Auto Workers. Their petition for an election was dismissed by the labor board's regional office on the ground that current law does not allow students to be treated as employees.

The union appealed to the board, which reversed the dismissal on Oct. 25, stating that there are compelling reasons to reconsider whether graduate teaching assistants should not be allowed to unionize and collectively bargain as employees.

The NLRB went on to say that, in its current view, the earlier decision was inconsistent with the broad definition of employee contained in the labor statutes and board precedent.

The clear implication of this development is that the new NLRB is ready to reverse decades of guidance and policy and find graduate students to be employees under the law. With all of the colleges and universities located in the Triangle and throughout North Carolina, the local impact of such a policy shift could be particularly acute.

With a majority of the Obama board's members having strong union backgrounds, the NLRB may be poised to do the one thing that a Democrat-controlled Congress could not do: help unions get more members. The process may be well under way.

Effecting change through regulatory agencies such as the NLRB often is just as effective as legislative overhaul, and it usually attracts less notice.

With the Employee Free Choice Act all but dead, Big Labor no doubt was pleased by NLRB-member Mark Pearce's announcement on Oct. 21 that he favors Canadian-style quickie elections, in which voting takes place within five to 10 days after a representation petition is filed. Because management's ability to campaign against unionization would be greatly reduced under such a system, some watchers suggest that unions could achieve a 75 percent to 90 percent success rate.

Time will tell whether the new NLRB succeeds in revising longstanding labor policy in order to promote unionization. For now, employers are conducting supervisor training, reviewing their policies and bracing themselves for what could be a bumpy ride.

 

 


Latest News

CampaignWebsites
Deliver your message anywhere, anytime.
Campaign Websites reinforce your campaign message in a format that preserves employee anonymity

More...

Union Awareness Program
PTI Labor Research has been obtaining and analyzing union activity and petitions for over 20 years. We have the largest and most extensive research data in the country which has been utilized by thousands of companies, labor lawyers and consultants.
More...

 

 
 
About Us          |          Services          |          News          |          Clients          |          FAQ          |          Contact Us

© 2009 PTI Labor Research. All Rights Reserved